2583
|
1935-06-13
|
Letter
|
Sending Hays a copy of Zanuck's letter detailing his proposed kidnapping story.
|
2584
|
1935-06-12
|
Letter
|
Zanuck does have a kidnapping story he would like to film -- at this stage it is just an idea, there is no script. Kidna...
|
2539
|
1935-06-11
|
Memo
|
Pettijohn's opinion on what should be done now that the Motion Picture Code has been abandoned. Includes a long memo fro...
|
2606
|
1935-06-07
|
Letter
|
Acknowledging Quigley's letter suggesting the PCA seal of approval and certificate number could be displayed as an emble...
|
1127
|
1935-06-05
|
Correspondence
|
Concern about the practice of some exhibitors eliminating the PCA Seal. Many fail to distinguish between censorship and...
|
2607
|
1935-06-03
|
Letter
|
Quigley is suggesting the PCA seal of approval and certificate number could be displayed as an emblem instead of a scree...
|
2608
|
1935-05-29
|
Letter
|
Acknowledging Quigley's letter regarding the trend of some theatres removing the PCA seal of approval from a print.
|
2609
|
1935-05-28
|
Letter
|
Some theatres are removing the PCA seal of approval -- Quigley feels this would not happen if the seal appeared in emble...
|
2588
|
1935-05-21
|
Letter
|
A list of all films that carry the PCA seal of approval has been sent to affiliated theatres and this list will be updat...
|
2589
|
1935-05-20
|
Memo
|
A list of all films that carry the PCA seal of approval has been sent to affiliated theatres and this list will be updat...
|
2590
|
1935-05-14
|
Letter
|
Schaefer proposes that the trade papers could run a list every week of films that have been approved by the PCA -- as th...
|
2649
|
1935-05-13
|
Letter
|
The issue of reissues of films under the Production Code -- if a film was both released and released prior to the Code b...
|
2610
|
1935-05-10
|
Letter
|
Regarding the ongoing problem of the PCA seal of approval -- again a suggestion that the feature film seal be replaced w...
|
2591
|
1935-05-09
|
Memo
|
There needs to be a system whereby theatre owners, particularly those not affiliated with majors, can find out which fil...
|
2651
|
1935-05-08
|
Letter
|
Any film released prior to 15 July 1934 that is reissued must be submitted to and approved by the PCA.
|
3198
|
1935-03-30
|
Letter
|
Hays responds to correspondence from Jessup, who has suggested that the role of motion pictures in education deserves fu...
|
2619
|
1935-03-26
|
Resolution
|
Sending a copy of the resolution allowing short subjects the briefer, and less costly, "approved" seal as opposed to the...
|
2621
|
1935-03-23
|
Letter
|
Thanking Quigley for Doctor Tippy's letter which details his opinion of the Production Code -- an opinion he gave in a s...
|
2622
|
1935-03-22
|
Letter
|
Quigley is sending Hays Doctor Tippy's letter which details his opinion of the Production Code -- an opinion he gave in ...
|
2560
|
1935-03-12
|
Letter
|
Ideas on how the motion picture, as a medium, can be best used as an educational tools. Pedagogic films.
|
2657
|
1935-03-06
|
Letter
|
Columbia will withdraw So This Is Africa and Hell Cat -- two films deemed no longer acceptable under the Production Code...
|
2658
|
1935-03-06
|
Letter
|
RKO is presented with a problem regarding the withdrawal of certain films deemed inappropriate under the Production Code...
|
2659
|
1935-03-06
|
Letter
|
Paramount agrees to immediately recall all prints of films deemed inappropriate under the Production Code and will recal...
|
2632
|
1935-03-01
|
Memo
|
Outlines the form the new PCA seal for short subjects will take if approved by the Board -- Hays feels this design is th...
|
2661
|
1935-02-26
|
Letter
|
Acknowledging assurances from Warner Bros. that they will withdraw their films currently in circulation that have been d...
|
2662
|
1935-02-25
|
|
Warner Bros. promises to withdraw the films it has in circulation that have been deemed inappropriate under the Producti...
|
2663
|
1935-02-25
|
Letter
|
Breen wants no film to be reissued without PCA approval. Films currently in circulation without PCA approval will now ne...
|
2664
|
1935-02-23
|
Letter
|
The development of a new classification system for films currently in circulation that don't carry the PCA seal of appro...
|
2666
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
Columbia has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered inappr...
|
2667
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
Universal has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered inapp...
|
2668
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
United Artists has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered ...
|
2669
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
Paramount has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered inapp...
|
2670
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
Warner Bros. has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered in...
|
2671
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
RKO has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered inappropria...
|
2672
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
MGM has not replied to Hays' letter concerning the elimination from further distribution of films considered inappropria...
|
2673
|
1935-02-22
|
Telegram
|
RKO's Finishing School should be withdrawn immediately and not re-released.
|
2675
|
1935-02-22
|
Letter
|
RKO's Finishing School should be withdrawn immediately and not re-released. The film was originally left off the list of...
|
2674
|
1935-02-22
|
Telegram
|
RKO's Finishing School was inadvertently left off the list of films currently in circulation that are no longer acceptab...
|
2465
|
1935-02-21
|
Memo
|
Nine press books from First Division Pictures, Inc. have been reviewed and if they had been submitted under the Advertis...
|
2665
|
1935-02-20
|
Letter
|
A list of various films currently in circulation that are not considered appropriate under the Production Code. These fi...
|
2676
|
1935-02-20
|
Memo
|
The list of films currently in circulation that are not acceptable under the Code. There are three classifications -- im...
|
2677
|
1935-02-20
|
Telegram
|
The list of films currently in circulation that are not acceptable under the Code. There are three classifications -- im...
|
2678
|
1935-02-20
|
Memo
|
Justifies the reasons for the inclusion of the Warner Bros. films in the list of objectionable films (11-0539) currently...
|
2466
|
1935-02-19
|
Memo
|
Hays is asking First Division Pictures to submit its advertising material for approval under the code.
|
2679
|
1935-02-16
|
Letter
|
Hays thanks Clark for withdrawing Fox's George White's Scandals and Hoopla from circulation. These two films have been i...
|
2680
|
1935-02-15
|
Letter
|
Fox has withdrawn George White's Scandals and Hoopla from circulation. These two films have been included on the list de...
|
1134
|
1935-02-10
|
Correspondence
|
Correspondence re movies recommended for withdrawal from circulation, especially in the light of the Catholic banned lis...
|
2681
|
1935-02-08
|
Correspondence
|
Certain films currently in circulation need to be withdrawn because they are not acceptable under the new provisions of ...
|
2559
|
1935-02-04
|
Memo
|
Asking Milliken to compile a memo listing the work of the MPPDA in relation to the development of pedagogic films, for a...
|
1117
|
1935-02-03
|
Memo
|
Summary of MPPDA initiatives in education, for Hays' information prior to a meeting with Walter A. Jessup of the Carnegi...
|
2509
|
1935-02-01
|
Memo
|
Memo on double features and the problems associated with them. Palfreyman notes instances when two vastly different film...
|
2510
|
1935-02-01
|
Memo
|
Memo compiling opinions on double features taken from recent studies and reports -- opinions are against double billing.
|
2511
|
1935-01-31
|
Memo
|
Another example of problem with double features: family film suitable for children exhibited with film appropriate only ...
|
2512
|
1935-01-31
|
Memo
|
King of Kings and Two Kinds of Women were shown together in a double feature.
|
2557
|
1935-01-21
|
Letter
|
Thanking Hays for information regarding clauses ensuring compliance with the Production Code and the financial charges i...
|
2685
|
1935-01-18
|
Memo
|
Informing Breen that the companies have been informed that reissues must receive PCA approval.
|
2689
|
1935-01-16
|
Telegram
|
Unanimous decision reached on reissues -- they need to be submitted and approved by the PCA.
|
2637
|
1935-01-09
|
Letter
|
Agreeing with the decision to have East Coast and foreign production submitted to the PCA.
|
2690
|
1935-01-07
|
Memo
|
Apparently most companies are not interested in reissues as they perform badly. Milliken feels they should still be subj...
|
2638
|
1935-01-07
|
Letter
|
Both Warner brothers agree with Hays on the decision to have all East Coast and foreign films submitted to the PCA for a...
|
2691
|
1935-01-05
|
Letter
|
Hays suggests reissues should be submitted for PCA approval prior to re-release.
|
1131
|
1935-01-03
|
Letter
|
All films produced abroad and on the East Coast will henceforth go through the West Coast PCA machinery. Hart will only...
|
1086
|
1934-12-28
|
Memo
|
Hays should send letter to MPPDA members in New York advising them of the change of Production Code procedure in regard ...
|
2370
|
1934-12-28
|
Memo
|
Gigolette (RKO) is finally acceptable under Production Code provisions. To be released 29 December 1934. The Battle (Uni...
|
2375
|
1934-12-21
|
Letter
|
Regarding the proposal for the PCA approval seal to appear in the main title of short subjects to avoid the need for ext...
|
2635
|
1934-12-21
|
Letter
|
Reminding Hays to raise the issue of shortening the PCA seal of approval on short subjects with Breen.
|
2683
|
1934-12-18
|
Memo
|
In relation to the compilation of a list of objectionable films still being exhibited that were released prior to 15 Jul...
|
2325
|
1934-12-17
|
Letter
|
Updating Hays on the medical film concerned with animal experimentation. Hays is the honorary president of the Board of ...
|
1027
|
1934-12-17
|
Memo
|
Columbia and Paramount would discontinue National Board of Review (NBR) and do not want wording changed. Kelly at MGM w...
|
2364
|
1934-12-13
|
Letter
|
Outlines the Florida state statute in relation to films and need for the seal of approval from the National Board of Rev...
|
2361
|
1934-12-11
|
Letter
|
Cohn is opposed to changing the NBR approval legend to "Classified and Passed by the National Board of Review" from the ...
|
1096
|
1934-12-10
|
Letter
|
Buckley thinks the continued employment of the National Board of Review (NBR) is a waste of money: "The NBR, as you know...
|
1082
|
1934-11-26
|
Letter
|
Calls to reduce the length of the PCA seal. Currently appears on screen for a relatively lengthy period of time. As patr...
|
2379
|
1934-11-23
|
Memo
|
Breen reports an consensus that the PCA seal of approval for short subjects should be changed due to its length, and the...
|
2490
|
1934-11-23
|
Letter
|
Two examples of eliminations the Kansas Censor Board insisted upon in two MGM films: The Painted Veil and The Gay Bride....
|
2489
|
1934-11-22
|
Memo
|
Regarding the Kansas Censor Board and the representation of liquor. The state board has no tolerance for any sequence in...
|
1019
|
1934-11-21
|
Memo
|
"After you left the meeting [of Advertising Committee] today, it was unanimously requested that you recommend to the pre...
|
1081
|
1934-11-20
|
Memo
|
Palfreyman had attended Loew's 83rd St. Theatre to investigate hissing of PCA Seal. The Production Code Administration s...
|
1100
|
1934-11-20
|
Letter
|
Schaefer suggests that the PCA seal of approval be placed with the main title, thereby reducing the cost of the process....
|
2306
|
1934-11-17
|
Letter
|
Hays feels the Production Code Administration seal of approval could be modified but is insistent that the emphasis of t...
|
2381
|
1934-11-16
|
Letter
|
Despite initial misgivings, Hays feels the PCA seal of approval should be shortened, particularly with short subjects.
|
2382
|
1934-11-13
|
Correspondence
|
Paramount is pushing for a change to the Production Code Administration seal of approval, particularly with short subjec...
|
2339
|
1934-10-24
|
Letter
|
Calling for a meeting of the Board of Directors on 30 October 1934 to further discuss an issue raised at the meeting hel...
|
1105
|
1934-10-15
|
Letter
|
Hays reassures Breen that Chadwick is not intended to actually join Breen's staff.
|
1099
|
1934-10-10
|
Memo
|
'Again attention is called to the dangerous situation developing due to the fact that a certain portion of the product w...
|
2347
|
1934-10-09
|
Memo
|
Stating the position of Monogram Pictures, the extent of its work, etc. for the purpose of membership to the MPPDA.
|
2349
|
1934-10-08
|
Memo
|
Regarding Monogram Pictures' proposed membership to MPPDA. Not eligible to be classed as a distributor or exchange. Cons...
|
1073
|
1934-10-08
|
Letter
|
According to Breen, Chadwick wants the PCA position for selfish reasons so all independent producers work through him -...
|
1080
|
1934-09-27
|
Letter
|
PCA seal and certificate occupies a lot of screen time, especially on shorts -- could some alternative method be used?
|
1070
|
1934-09-27
|
Memo
|
Independent producers want to use Chadwick as their PCA contact and pay him $40 per film.
|
1069
|
1934-09-27
|
Memo
|
it is OK to eliminate charges to independent producers for using PCA and Production Code machinery, but they had agreed ...
|
2350
|
1934-09-20
|
Memo
|
Monogram Pictures interested in becoming member of MPPDA.
|
1977
|
1934-09-19
|
Letter
|
Companies should be informed of all plays that the MPPDA does not feel are suitable to adapt. Refers to "Old Folks at Ho...
|
2387
|
1934-09-12
|
Letter
|
Kent wants to discuss the issue of audiences responding audibly and negatively to the PCA seal of approval when it appea...
|
970
|
1934-09-04
|
Correspondence
|
The major companies reply to 4 September 1934 Hays inquiry about notifying other companies about suspect plays and books...
|
969
|
1934-09-04
|
Letter
|
'When a company, before the purchase of a book or play, asks the opinion of this office or the PCA as to whether or not ...
|
1979
|
1934-09-04
|
Letter
|
Sending Breen a copy of the letter to member companies (4 September 1934) regarding notification.
|
1978
|
1934-09-03
|
Letter
|
Hays intends to ask opinion of member companies concerning the notification of suspect books and plays. Schenck feels ha...
|
971
|
1934-08-30
|
Letter
|
Complaint from Joe Schenck that PCA did not notify him of their objection to English play "The Old Folks at Home" which ...
|
1020
|
1934-08-24
|
Letter
|
Re publicity men's' report on boycott and censorship emergency -- does not agree with it as a whole but thinks the ide...
|